• Cancer Center Workers Warned about Cell Phone Risks
• New Mexico Allergy Sufferers Want Public Wi-Fi Ban
• Study Cautions Pregnant Women On Cell Phone Use
• Researcher: Cell Phones `More Dangerous Than Smoking`
• Cell Phones May Provide False Sense Of Security
• Study Suggests Cell Phone-Salivary Gland Cancer Link
• Scientist Worries WiFi May Harm Children
• British Study To Examine Cell Phone-Health Links
• Study: Cell Phone Use Not Linked to Cancer Risk
• FDA Will Review Cell Phone-Cancer Link
• Supreme Court Clears Cell Phone Cancer Suits for Trial
• St. Louis Researchers Find Cell Phone Radiation Doesn`t Promote Cancer
• Swedish Study Finds No Cell Phone-Cancer Link in First Decade of Use
• WHO Study Examines Cellphone Risks to Kids
• Judges OKs Cell Phone Safety Case
• Cell Phones May Harm Sperm Cells, British Study Finds
• Swedish Study Finds Cell Phone-Brain Tumor Link
• Firefly Promotes Cell Phone for Kids
• Researchers: Cell Phones Pose Cancer Risk for Kids
• British Lab Will Study Cell Phone Radiation
• Swedish Study Finds Higher Risk in Long-Term Users
• Cell Phones Probably Safe: British Study
• Court Blocks Cell Phone "Ray Blockers"
• Cell Phone Radiation Suit Dismissed
• Baltimore attorney Peter Angelos enters cell suit
• New Orleans judge lets cell-phone suit stand
• Report Finds "Legitimate Questions" About Cell Phone Safety
• Doctor Blames Cell Phones for His Brain Tumor
• Cell Phone Cancer Link
• Readers Report Their Problems
• Cell Phone Safety: An Editorial

In Baltimore, U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake dismissed the suits on the grounds that federal standards regulating cell phones pre-empt the state laws under which the suits were filed. Her ruling did not address the question of whether cell phone emissions represent a health hazard.

The judge said that the Federal Communications Commission and the Food and Drug Administration have the authority to regulate cell phones and their decisions are not subject to state review.

The suits, filed in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Georgia and Louisiana, claimed that Nokia and Motorola had failed to advise users of their cell phones that headsets could reduce the risk of brain tumors.

Last September, Judge Blake dismissed an $800 million lawsuit filed by a Baltimore neurologist who claimed his cell phone gave him brain cancer. That suit had been filed by Peter Angelos, a prominent Baltimore attorney who was also involved in the five suits dismissed this week.

Several studies have found no adverse health effects from cell phones and most scientists say the frequencies used by cell phones are not dangerous, even when used in close proximity to the brain. However, both the FDA and FCC say they support additional research.

Related News