The Federal Trade Commission has reached a settlement with Comstar Communications, Inc. and its president, Randall A. Carasco, who marketed and sold "WaveShield," "WaveShield 1000," and "WaveShield 2000" -- so-called cell phone "radiation protection patches."
Using television, radio, and Internet advertising, the defendants allegedly claimed that their products could block up to 99 percent of radiation and other electromagnetic energy emitted by cellular telephones, thereby reducing consumers` exposure to this radiation. In February 2002, the FTC issued a complaint against the West Sacramento, California-based defendants alleging that the claims were false and unsubstantiated.
The order prohibits the defendants from the future marketing or selling of any product that claims to reduce consumers` exposure to radiation and electromagnetic energy, unless the claims are true and can be substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence. The order also prohibits the defendants from making unsubstantiated representations about the benefits, performance, or efficacy of any product or service.
The settlement requires the defendants to clearly disclose that most electromagnetic energy emitted by cell phones comes from parts of the phone other than the earpiece, where the WaveShield is placed, and that the WaveShield has no significant effect on this other radiation.
Additionally, the settlement prohibits the defendants from misrepresenting the results of any test, study, or research.
|
07.05.2003
Court Order Snags Cell Phone "Radiation Protection Patches"
The Federal Trade Commission has reached a settlement with Comstar Communications, Inc. and its president, Randall A. Carasco, who marketed and sold "WaveShield," "WaveShield 1000," and "WaveShield 2000" -- so-called cell phone "radiation protection patches." Using... |
|
08.03.2003
Cell Phone Radiation Suit Dismissed
• Cancer Center Workers Warned about Cell Phone Risks• New Mexico Allergy Sufferers Want Public Wi-Fi Ban• Study Cautions Pregnant Women On Cell Phone Use• Researcher: Cell Phones `More Dangerous Than Smoking`• Cell Phones May Provide... |
|
31.08.2004
Court Bans Cell Phone Spammer
Text Spam• Illinois Sues Text-Message Spammers• Arizona Court Rules Against Unwanted Text Messaging• Cell Spam On the Rise• Court Bans Cell Phone Spammer Verizon Wireless has won an injunction against a Rhode Island cell phone spammer, the... |
|
01.12.2004
British Lab Will Study Cell Phone Radiation
A British laboratory will study whether mobile phone towers have adverse effects on human health. The Electromagnetics and Health (EMH) Laboratory at the University of Essex will conduct the largest study of its kind into the impact of electromagnetic fields emitted... |
|
07.10.2005
St. Louis Researchers Find Cell Phone Radiation Doesn`t Promote Cancer
Weighing in on the debate about whether cell phones have adverse health effects, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have found in a study funded by Motorola that the electromagnetic radiation produced by cell phones does not activate... |
|
