• Cancer Center Workers Warned about Cell Phone Risks
• New Mexico Allergy Sufferers Want Public Wi-Fi Ban
• Study Cautions Pregnant Women On Cell Phone Use
• Researcher: Cell Phones `More Dangerous Than Smoking`
• Cell Phones May Provide False Sense Of Security
• Study Suggests Cell Phone-Salivary Gland Cancer Link
• Scientist Worries WiFi May Harm Children
• British Study To Examine Cell Phone-Health Links
• Study: Cell Phone Use Not Linked to Cancer Risk
• FDA Will Review Cell Phone-Cancer Link
• Supreme Court Clears Cell Phone Cancer Suits for Trial
• St. Louis Researchers Find Cell Phone Radiation Doesn`t Promote Cancer
• Swedish Study Finds No Cell Phone-Cancer Link in First Decade of Use
• WHO Study Examines Cellphone Risks to Kids
• Judges OKs Cell Phone Safety Case
• Cell Phones May Harm Sperm Cells, British Study Finds
• Swedish Study Finds Cell Phone-Brain Tumor Link
• Firefly Promotes Cell Phone for Kids
• Researchers: Cell Phones Pose Cancer Risk for Kids
• British Lab Will Study Cell Phone Radiation
• Swedish Study Finds Higher Risk in Long-Term Users
• Cell Phones Probably Safe: British Study
• Court Blocks Cell Phone "Ray Blockers"
• Cell Phone Radiation Suit Dismissed
• Baltimore attorney Peter Angelos enters cell suit
• New Orleans judge lets cell-phone suit stand
• Report Finds "Legitimate Questions" About Cell Phone Safety
• Doctor Blames Cell Phones for His Brain Tumor
• Cell Phone Cancer Link
• Readers Report Their Problems
• Cell Phone Safety: An Editorial

With Chief Justice John Roberts presiding, the court refused to consider an appeal from cell phone manufacturers, who wanted the high court to overturn a decision by the 4th U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond.

Class-action lawsuits currently pending in Maryland, New York and Pennsylvania allege that cell phone radiation can cause brain tumors. The suits allege the manufacturers are aware of the danger and have deliberately kept consumers in the dark.

The suits seek to force phone manufacturers to reduce the amount of radiation produced by phones, and to advise users of the alleged health hazards.

In 2004, Judge Catherine Blake dismissed five of the lawsuits. But in March the appeals court ruled 2-1 that four of the five cases must be sent back to lower courts for trial.

Motorola, Nokia, Nextel Communications, Sprint and Cingular Wireless are among defendants named in the lawsuits.

Related News