Select a distance from to
Cheap calling cards International phone cards for cell phones Prepaid international cell phones
Prepaid calling cards
 

Internet Providers Ponder Bandwidth Limits For Heavy Users




Net Neutrality
• Internet Providers Ponder Bandwidth Limits For Heavy Users
• Comcast, Cox Caught Blocking BitTorrent
• Will Antitrust Law Save Net Neutrality?
• Few Are Neutral in Net Neutrality Battles
• Net Neutrality Supporters Testify
• Comcast Blocks Public From FCC Hearing
• Congress Gets Net Neutrality Legislation
• Time Warner To Test Metered Pricing For Broadband
• House Committee To Probe FCC
• FCC To Investigate Comcast For Blocking Net Traffic
• Verizon Wireless Opens Network to All Devices, Software
• Comcast Sued Over Internet Blocking
• Verizon Overrides Internet Searches With Its Own Results
• Comcast Blocks Subscribers From Some Services
• Verizon`s Abortion Block Raises Net Neutrality Concerns
• FTC Nixes Net Neutrality
• Wireless Spectrum May Hold Key To Net Neutrality
• Telcos Lift Block On FreeConference.Com
• FCC Takes Another Look at Net Neutrality
• AT&T Blocks Calls To Competing Conference Call Service
• Study: Ending Net Neutrality Would Hurt Consumers
• FCC, FTC Challenged To Protect Net Neutrality
• Net Neutrality Back on Congress` Agenda
• Net Neutrality Opponents Step Up PR Blitz
• AT&T Trumpets New TV Service
• Verizon Joins BellSouth in Retreat From Unexplained New DSL Fee
• FCC Nudges BellSouth Into Giving Up New DSL Fees
• FTC Head Urges "Caution" On Net Neutrality
• Net Neutrality May Derail Telecom Bill
• Google: No Net Neutrality Means Antitrust Fight
• Senate Prepares for Net Neutrality Showdown
• Congress Moves Quickly To Satisfy Telecoms` Net Neutrality, Cable Entry Demands
• Net Neutrality Gets Its Day In Congress
• Net Neutrality Wins Committee Vote In Congress
• Net Neutrality Attracts Surprising Allies
• Congress Wrestles with Net Neutrality

Airlines aren`t the only ones tacking on fees for services customers have taken for granted for years. Two cable giants – Comcast and Time Warner Cable – say they intend to test plans that would charge extra fees for heavy Internet usage.

It`s a throwback to the days when you had to deposit another quarter to talk for a few more minutes on a pay phone.

Comcast says it has selected two markets -- Chambersburg, Pennsylvania and Warrenton, Virginia -- to put its new system into place. The company would delay traffic for the heaviest users.

Last year Comcast warned its customers that the heaviest users could end up losing their service if they used too much of it. But consumers complained that the company never spelled out exactly what constituted too much.

In May a report found both Comcast Cable and Cox Communications were using technologies that block or slow customers` access to the BitTorrent file-sharing engine, raising howls of indignation from consumers who complained to the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC is currently investigating the matter.

Under its new plan, Comcast said it would not target users of any particular application.

Time Warner also plans to limit consumers` bandwidth, but is providing more options. Just as airline passengers may pay extra for a bag of pretzels, Time Warner subscribers who find their heavy usage has resulted in slower speed may pay an additional fee to be restored to normal service.

Time Warner said it will institute a metered usage system. It compares the system to how consumers are currently charged for cell phone minutes. It will begin test marketing the plan in Beaumont, Texas.

Ben Scott, head of policy for the public interest group Free Press, told the Washington Post that the new strategy reflects a decision to admit publicly what the Internet providers have been doing secretly all along. He also saidit won`t provide the kind of relief that would result from larger investments in high-speed networks.

Comcast-Cox

In the Comcast-Cox dust-up, researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems in Germany conducted their study through measuring the traffic of 8,175 Internet users across the world.

The researchers detected conclusive evidence of "traffic shaping" or blocking from only three Internet service providers -- Comcast and Cox in the United States, and StarHub in Singapore. The researchers said 599 users were blocked in the United States, 573 of them on Comcast or Cox networks.

Although Comcast originally defended its content blocking practices as "reasonable network management" that was concentrated on peak hours of Internet use, the Institute`s report indicated that both Comcast and Cox blocked access to BitTorrent at all times of the day.

"The percentage of blocked connections remains high at all times of the day," the report authors said. "Our data suggests that the BitTorrent blocking is independent of the time of the day."

Supporters of "net neutrality," the principle that all Internet content should be accessed equally, pointed to the discovery as further evidence that cable and other Internet providers cannot be trusted to police their networks without infringing on users` rights. "Consumers have no reason left to trust their cable company," said Ben Scott, policy director of Free Press. "This independent study confirms that Comcast is still blocking its customers from using popular applications -- despite the FCC`s investigation and widespread public outrage."

Comcast`s content blocking, first confirmed in October 2007, also led to customer lawsuits, and several hearings into proper network management conducted by the FCC. Comcast`s image was further tarnished by its paying people to fill seats at the first hearing in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Cox released a brief statement to the Associated Press claiming that "[t]o ensure the best possible online experience for our customers, Cox actively manages network traffic through a variety of methods including traffic prioritization and protocol filtering."

The renewed push for net neutrality protection against content blocking has led to the introduction of several pieces of legislation in Congress.

One bill, the "Internet Freedom Preservation Act" co-sponsored by Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), would amend the Communications Act of 1934 to include the principles of open access to the Internet as codified law. The "Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act," introduced by House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), would use antitrust regulations to prevent price discrimination through forcing different customers to pay more for higher bandwith usage.



 

Related News

 
Internet Providers Ponder Bandwidth Limits For Heavy Users
Net Neutrality• Internet Providers Ponder Bandwidth Limits For Heavy Users• Comcast, Cox Caught Blocking BitTorrent• Will Antitrust Law Save Net Neutrality?• Few Are Neutral in Net Neutrality Battles• Net Neutrality Supporters...
 
Comcast Cuts Off Heavy Internet Users
• Bandwidth limits• Installation• Peer-to-peer networks• Pricing• Reliability• Speed• Spam blocking---News• Comcast Blocks Subscribers From Some Services• Comcast Cuts Off Heavy Internet Users---•Cable...
 
Comcast Agrees To Stop Blocking Internet Users
Net Neutrality• Internet Providers Ponder Bandwidth Limits For Heavy Users• Comcast, Cox Caught Blocking BitTorrent• Will Antitrust Law Save Net Neutrality?• Few Are Neutral in Net Neutrality Battles• Net Neutrality Supporters...
 
11.12.2009 Study Sees Little Hope For Rural Internet Users
If you happen to live in a rural area of America, chances are your Internet options are limited. While federal stimulus money has been allocated to expand broadband services to rural areas, a new study suggests rural residents shouldn`t get their hopes up.Analysis of...
 
21.06.2004 Cablevision Rolls Out Internet/Cable/Phone Package
Competition for local telephone service is at last heating up, as cable companies begin their first serious push into local and long-distance service, routing calls over the Internet to avoid the call completion charges that artificially inflate the price of ...